Step 01
Three editable appeal drafts
Measured first-person, confident first-person, and a hypothetical legal letter written in third person.
Built around the 2026 Newby v. Adelphi ruling
Lost your AI cheating hearing?
It feels worse the second time. Get three editable appeal drafts built around the procedural and substantive failures in your hearing. Review before emailing or downloading. $49.
Deadline check
Appeals are procedural.
If your decision relied mainly on a detector score, or if you were not given a fair chance to respond, the appeal should say that clearly.
Why appeals win
Appeals do not win on emotion. They win on procedure.
A good appeal focuses on the record: what evidence was used, what process was followed, what evidence was ignored, and what remedy you are asking for.
The precedent
On January 28, 2026, a court ruled that an AI detector score alone is not enough.
In Matter of Newby v. Adelphi University, a New York Supreme Court ordered an AI-related academic integrity charge removed after the finding rested on inadequate evidence. NotBot is built around that defense pattern: challenge the detector score, organize your process evidence, and keep the tone measured.
What you get
Built around your situation, not a template.
Step 02
Merged next-steps guide
Appeal record organization, evidence cleanup, detector triangulation, and what to attach before the deadline.
Step 03
PDF and Word export
Review edits first, then email all documents or download the current draft or the full set.
How it works
Three steps. Ten minutes.
01
Tell us what happened
Deadline, hearing outcome, procedural issues, and the evidence you have now.
02
We build the appeal drafts
Claude drafts three appeal options and a merged next-steps guide.
03
You review before sending
Edit the drafts, then email all or download PDF and Word files.
Start now
Your deadline is the whole job now.
Appeals do not win on emotion. They win when the record shows procedural and evidence problems.