The accusation lands
You get the email, the detector score, and the meeting notice. The risk suddenly feels huge.
Wrongly accused of using AI? Turn the panic into three editable response drafts, a clear next-steps guide, and appeal backup. Review before emailing or downloading. $49.
NotBot package
Response letter
“I did not use AI to write this paper.”
Detector pushback, Newby framing, your evidence list, and a clear request to review the actual evidence.
Why honest students get flagged
Students who use Grammarly, edit heavily, write in a structured way, or write in English as a second language can end up with the same accusation form as someone who cheated. The response has to be specific, documented, and calm.
Turnitin says AI writing reports should not be used alone for adverse action.
Independent studies have reported higher false-positive risk for non-native English writers.
Version history and drafting evidence are often stronger than arguing about detectors in the abstract.
The rescue path
You get the email, the detector score, and the meeting notice. The risk suddenly feels huge.
Detector, score, what you actually did, course details, evidence, school, and country.
Three editable drafts and one merged guide land behind your package link before anything is sent as final.
Product preview
You get editable drafts, clean PDFs, Word files, and a plan for proving your writing process before the hearing gets away from you.
Response letter
A professional letter that says what happened, challenges detector-only evidence, and offers your drafting proof without sounding combative.
Next-steps guide
Google Docs history, Word versions, research history, prior writing samples, detector triangulation, hearing prep, and what not to touch.
Draft editor
Toggle between the three drafts, make edits, then email all or download PDF and Word files.
What lands in your inbox
The output has to be usable under pressure: clear titles, formal formatting, disclaimers, editable drafts, and filenames that make sense when you are attaching them to an email or bringing them to a hearing.
NotBot response letter
Detector score addressed without sounding defensive.
Includes Turnitin guidance, Newby framing, your evidence list, and a request for the actual evidence being used.
The precedent
In Matter of Newby v. Adelphi University, a New York Supreme Court ordered an AI-related academic integrity charge removed after the finding rested on inadequate evidence. NotBot is built around that defense pattern: challenge the detector score, organize your process evidence, and keep the tone measured.
What you get
Step 01
Measured first-person, confident first-person, and a hypothetical legal letter written in third person.
Step 02
Evidence collection, detector triangulation, hearing prep, and what not to do.
Step 03
Review edits first, then email all documents or download the current draft or the full set.
Step 04
If the hearing goes badly, return to your package link and claim your appeal letter at no extra cost.
How it works
01
Five to seven minutes of guided intake, saved locally as you go.
02
Claude drafts three response options and a merged next-steps guide.
03
Edit the drafts, then email all or download PDF and Word files. No account.
Start now
You cannot control the accusation. You can control how clear, documented, and professional your response is.